UTIO

AI glossary · Safety and regulation

AI hallucination

In one sentence

An AI hallucination is a response from an AI model that sounds convincing but is false or not backed by any source: a figure, quote, price or reference the model invents while generating the most probable text.

Also known as: hallucination · ChatGPT hallucinations · confabulation · LLM hallucination

What is an AI hallucination?

The term is borrowed from psychology, but in AI it means something more mundane: the model states something untrue, with the same confidence it uses for things that are true. It might be a date, a section of a law that doesn’t exist, a quote attributed to someone who never said it, or a shop’s opening hours that it imagined.

Put it to work

AI agents that look after your customers

From €49/mo + VAT

Voice, WhatsApp and email with the phone line included: agent, numbers and CRM in one fee.

See plans and pricing

One of the most cited cases happened in the US in 2023: a lawyer filed a brief citing court rulings that a chatbot had generated. The rulings didn’t exist, and the lawyer was sanctioned.

Hallucinations aren’t a one-off bug in a particular model. They follow from the way every LLM works.

Related to this term

UTIO agents

  • Available 24/7 in 26 languages
  • Set it up yourself for €0: built from your website
  • 14-day free trial, no card needed

From €49/mo + VAT

See plans and pricing

How it works

A language model generates text by choosing, token by token, whatever is most likely to come next. It doesn’t consult a database of facts. So:

  • If the fact isn’t in what it learned, or appeared only rarely, the model fills the gap with something plausible.
  • If the question takes something for granted, such as “what time does your Leeds branch open?” when there’s no Leeds branch, the model tends to play along.
  • If the temperature is high, there’s more randomness in word choice, and more risk with it.

What reduces them most:

  1. Give it the sources: with RAG, the model answers from your documents rather than from memory.
  2. Tell it not to answer anything that isn’t in those sources, and let it say “I don’t know”.
  3. Review anything important before it reaches a customer.

Reasoning models and fine-tuning can improve accuracy on some tasks, but they don’t make the problem go away.

Example

A small chain of opticians in Glasgow trials a generic chatbot on its website. A customer asks whether their health cash plan is accepted, and the chatbot says yes, quoting a specific discount. Neither the arrangement nor the discount exists: the model inferred them from the idea that “opticians often work with health plans”.

The chain changes tack: it uploads its real list of accepted plans and their terms as a knowledge base and instructs the assistant to say so when a plan isn’t on the list, then pass the query to the team.

Hallucinations at UTIO

UTIO’s agents answer from your knowledge base. In the support vertical, anything not in the documentation goes unanswered rather than invented: the agent takes a note and opens a ticket in the CRM. Autonomy is also gradual: you can start in draft mode, with a person approving every reply.

The content agent applies the same principle to what you publish: no figure goes out without a source; if it doesn’t have one, it pauses the campaign and tells you exactly which sentence needs backing up. That way an AI agent speaks for you without making up what it doesn’t know.

Frequently asked questions

Why does AI make things up?

Because a language model is trained to produce the most probable text, not to check whether it's true. When it lacks a fact, it rarely says 'I don't know' of its own accord: it fills the gap with something that fits the sentence. That's why hallucinations sound so confident.

Can hallucinations be eliminated completely?

Not today. They can be greatly reduced: by giving the model the sources with every query, telling it to answer only from them, allowing it to say it doesn't know, and reviewing anything important before it's published or sent to a customer.

Who's liable if my company's chatbot gives out false information?

As far as your customer is concerned, usually your company: the assistant speaks on your behalf. Courts have already held a business to what its chatbot said. So it's wise to limit what it can state and pass anything not covered by its sources to a person.

Related terms

  • RAG

    RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) is a technique in which a language model first retrieves the relevant passages from your own documents and then writes its answer from them, instead of relying on what it memorised in training.

  • Grounding

    Grounding is the practice of making an AI model base its answers on specific, verifiable sources, such as your documents, a database or a search, rather than on what it remembers from training.

  • Guardrails

    Guardrails are the safeguards placed around an AI model to keep it within agreed limits: checks on what goes in and comes out, limits on topics and actions, and rules for handing a case to a person when needed.

  • Knowledge base

    A knowledge base is a business's organised store of information (FAQs, terms, opening hours, product sheets, procedures) that an AI agent or a team draws on for answers.

  • Temperature

    Temperature is a language model setting that controls how much randomness goes into choosing each token. At low values the model nearly always picks the most likely option and replies predictably; at high values it varies more and comes across as more creative.

Updated on

← Back to the glossary

UTIO is the AI agent line of Universal Telecom, an operator registered with the CNMC.